We re-examined the phenomenon of rotational instability in radio pulsars on decadal timescales using a sample of 315 radio pulsars whose spin-rates [rotation period and spin-down rate] have been measured on, at least two different epochs. The first stage of our analysis involves a direct comparison of the measured values of and at two epochs that are years apart in order to estimate the fluctuation in the parameters. The results show that the fluctuation in the objects’ rotational period is significant in 293 pulsars, while it is at the level of measurement uncertainties in the remaining 22 pulsars. For 293 objects, the fractional change in was found to have absolute values in the range of. Similarly, the observed fluctuation in spin-down rate was considered significant in only 178 pulsars in the sample. In this case, the fractional change in the parameter , irrespective of sign, has values in the range of . Further analysis of our sample reveals a moderate correlation with between and . On the other hand, only weak correlations with were found between and the pulsar spindown parameters, which suggests that they are unrelated. For seven radio pulsars, whose spin-rates and have been measured at five different epochs, we found strong evidence for non-stationarity of the objects’ spin-down rates. The braking indices of the 315 radio pulsars were extensively measured using three different methods that involve: (i) integration of the spin-down law, differentiation of the spin-down law and direct measurement of pulsar period second derivative using measurement of at two epochs years apart. The three methods produced braking indices of anomalous values with magnitudes in the range of . Irrespective of methods of measurement, the absolute values of were found to be strongly correlated with with the pulsar spin-down age and anti-correlated with with objects’ spin-down rate and surface magnetic field.
Using this Service/Resources:
You are allowed to use the original model papers you will receive in the following ways:
1. As a source for additional understanding of the subject.
2. As a source for ideas for your own research work (if properly referenced).
3. For PROPER paraphrasing (see your university definition of plagiarism and acceptable paraphrase)
4. Direct citing (if referenced properly)
Thank you so much for your respect to the authors copyright.